« February 2006 | Main | April 2006 »

March 30, 2006

Catholic Charities in Open Dissent

Newly-installed (Feb. 15, 2006) Archbishop George Niederauer has informed San Francisco's Catholic Charities that, in accord with recent Vatican directives issued by Cardinal Levada (former Archbishop of San Francisco), they may no longer place children for adoption with homosexuals. As detailed in an article (which now seems to have disappeared) by Ignatius Insight, Catholic Charities has decided to defy the Archbishop and the Vatican and continue placement of children with homosexuals.

Please consider calling (415-614-5500) or emailing (info@sfarchdiocese.org) the Archdiocese of San Francisco to express your support for Archbishop Niederauer's implementation of the Vatican's directive.

March 29, 2006

Remembering Terri

Fr. Frank Pavone of Priests for Life issued an open letter to Michael Schiavo to commemorate the anniversary of Terri's death by dehydration. As one who sat by her bedside and watched the suffering she endured, Fr. Pavone calls it as he sees it, and as he knows God sees it, whether or not Michael Schiavo won the legal battle to kill his wife.

We need to remember Pastor Niemoller's comment (paraphrased) "In Germany they first came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me -- and by that time no one was left to speak up."

In other words, first it was legal to kill the unborn baby, and I didn't speak up because I was already born. Then it was legal to kill a disabled woman who wasn't dying of a terminal illness, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't disabled. What will happen next? Killing mentally retarded people because they don't "produce?" Killing the old because they're a "burden?" If we can't stand up for the basic dignity of human life because it is given by God and made in His image, then at the very least, can't we see the danger to ourselves? We won't be young forever.

March 28, 2006

Do you trust God?

Raymond Arroyo's book, Mother Angelica: The Remarkable Story of a Nun, Her Nerve, and a Network of Miracles brought me suffering, joy, fear, and confidence. In Mother's life, peppered with trials and joys, I met a woman who trusts Jesus, her Spouse, in all things, and I am ashamed to admit that I lack that level of trust, that level of abandonment to God. I can add, however, that I have been praying to align my will completely with God's, and I find this book filled with inspiration. I am a wife and mother, not a cloistered nun and not Mother Angelica, and so the manner of my faith in the Lord will differ from hers in the details. God asks things of me that he doesn't of her, and vice versa, but underneath all that must be the recognition of the passionate love of Jesus for us and the proper response we must have to Love. This book reminds me to strive to unite my will to Christ's, and to unite my suffering to Christ's. I highly recommend reading it.

Parents' rights in California

As Gerald Augustinus of The Cafeteria Is Closed commented recently, parental rights in the U.K. have taken quite a blow. We are faced with similar problems here in California where a school-aged girl can't be given an aspirin without parental permission, but can be taken for an abortion, for surgery, without her parents knowing about it. If you have yet to sign the petition to get parental notification back on the California ballot, please consider getting petitions from Parents' Right to Know. You can call toll-free (866) 828-8355 or email Janet@ParentsRight2Know.org to receive the forms. Let's not go the way of the U.K.

March 26, 2006

"Marriage is for White People"

A sobering report by Joy Jones in the Washington Post on the demise of marriage among blacks.

[...] when I taught a career exploration class for sixth-graders at an elementary school in Southeast Washington. I was pleasantly surprised when the boys in the class stated that being a good father was a very important goal to them, more meaningful than making money or having a fancy title.

"That's wonderful!" I told my class. "I think I'll invite some couples in to talk about being married and rearing children."

"Oh, no," objected one student. "We're not interested in the part about marriage. Only about how to be good fathers."

And that's when the other boy chimed in, speaking as if the words left a nasty taste in his mouth: "Marriage is for white people."

He's right. At least statistically. The marriage rate for African Americans has been dropping since the 1960s, and today, we have the lowest marriage rate of any racial group in the United States.

"Since the 1960s"...That date is no coincidence. What we're seeing are the unintended consequences of the anti-poverty approach that began in the 1960s. Government intervention that eliminates the need for traditional societal structures such as family and work might have been done in the name of compassion or social justice, but the long term effects have been terribly destructive. Jones gives an indication of how bad it's gotten:

I was stunned to learn that a black child was more likely to grow up living with both parents during slavery days than he or she is today, according to sociologist Andrew J. Cherlin.

It's not just the black community that can look forward to this cultural devastation. Jones continues:

In his 2003 book, "Mismatch: The Growing Gulf between Women and Men," Andrew Hacker noted that the structure of white families is evolving in the direction of that of black families of the 1960s. In 1960, 67 percent of black families were headed by a husband and wife, compared to 90.9 percent for whites. By 2000, the figure for white families had dropped to 79.8 percent. Births to unwed white mothers were 22.5 percent in 2001, compared to 2.3 percent in 1960. So my student who thought marriage is for white people may have to rethink that in the future.

The modern, "values-neutral" approach to societal issues has proven a disaster. We're unwilling to call misogynistic "Hip-Hop" filth what it is for fear of being "judgmental." We don't expect young people to be chaste and follow abstinence because it's "unrealistic." We're willing to stretch the definition of "marriage" to fit just about any combination imaginable, yet aren't willing to insist on traditional marriage--including an expectation that couples stay together during the hard times. If all this is unrealistic, then here's "Reality:" abusive young men from fatherless families spending half their life in prison and abused young women becoming single mothers, raising the next generation of prison inmates and single mothers.

We need to take a stand. We should do so charitably, out of love for those who have made wrong choices. But we have to be willing to show what we believe by the example of our lives, and pass those beliefs on to the next generation.

March 24, 2006

Krauthammer on Iraq

Charles Krauthammer cuts through the chaff on the question of whether Iraq is on the verge of civil war:

This whole debate about civil war is surreal. What is the insurgency if not a war supported by one (minority) part of Iraqi society fighting to prevent the birth of the new Iraqi state supported by another (majority) part of Iraqi society?

By definition that is civil war.

The question, then, is what is to be done about it:

The principal issue, and measure of our success, is the shaping of disciplined and effective security forces. And that is why the political negotiations that have been dragging on are so critical. It is the political track that must secure leadership for both the defense and interior ministries that is nonsectarian and committed to a unitary force whose members do not answer to private warlords. Civil wars are not eternal. This war will end not with an Appomattox instrument of surrender. It will end when a critical mass of Sunnis stops supporting the insurgency and throws its lot in with the new Iraq.

How does this happen? The stick is military -- the increased cost in Sunni blood of continuing the fight. But the carrot is political -- a place at the table for those Sunnis, some of whom are represented in parliament, who are prepared to abandon the insurgency for a share of power, a share of oil income, and a sense of security and dignity in the new Iraq.

This is doable. That is not to say it will be done. It is to say that those who have decided that because of "civil war" it cannot be done have been unreasonably panicked by something that has been with us all along.

March 22, 2006

Is Paris worth a few altar girls?

Don Jim (Fr. Jim Tucker) reports that for the first time his Bishop, Paul Loverde of Arlington, Virginia has authorized the traditional Latin Rite every Sunday at two parishes in his diocese. In the same message, Bishop Loverde announced that "altar girls" would be allowed to participate in parish and high school liturgies.

Fr. Tucker does a good job summarizing the downside of altar girls, so I won't rehash the arguments. However, as I've already posted, Fr. Tucker is a fan of the Old Mass. On balance, he's stoked, saying "if that's the price of the two 'Tridentine' Masses, I think it's quite a bargain."

His comment reminded me of Henry of Navarre, who is reputed to have said Paris vaut bien une messe ("Paris is well worth a Mass").

If Paris is worth a Mass, and Tridentine Masses are worth a few altar girls, we can only conclude...

March 21, 2006

Daddy, put your wallet away

On the way to Mass tonight for the Feast of St. Benedict, our five year old daughter, Sarah, told me "Daddy, put your wallet away. If you leave it out in the car, John Kerry will take all your money."

Good girl.

Keeping the Faith

Among the posts on her recent trip to Rome, Amy Welborn gave some good advice on the danger to one's faith that can come from ministry:

Beware of your desire to do ministry: Can be dangerous to your faith. Why? [...] it becomes a "job" with all of the attendant frustations, and it becomes hard to separate your own personal faith from this. You see amazing rotten things up close and personal. You are sorely tempted to fall into the Customer Service Dymanic, and see the people you're serving as customers, who are usually annoying, and you'd rather they all just go away and stop bothering you with their problems. You fall in a rut, and your motivation starts coming from other places, not the commitment to serve.
I've seen this dynamic at work. There can be a tendency to adopt an "us vs. them" mentality and to think we know what's best for the common folk. This sort of pride can be poisonous. The proper attitude, I think, is to recognize that we have been given a great treasure by Christ that helps all of us "know what's best." It is our job to protect this treasure, proclaim it throughout the world, and pass it on safely to those who come after us. It's humbling.

Pray for all those in ministry. It's a tough job, with risks to those who pursue it.

How does this apply in the Catholic context? I've often seen a very dismissive attitude by some of those wrapped up in the "Spirit of Vatican II" that rejects everything that came before the Council (except for some nebulously defined "early Church"). The "we know what's best" attitude is palpable.

Conversely, some of those who recoil at the abuses in the post-Vatican II Church, make the mistake of rejecting the work of the Council. Again, they adopt the same "we know what's best" attitude. An analgous political example in the U.S. would be to conclude that because of the abuses by the Courts, the Constitution must be invalid and should be rejected.

The proper attitude (in both cases) is to root out the abuses by appealing to the (valid) prinicples in the original document (or in the case of the Council: documents).

March 18, 2006

Fighting Smarter in Iraq

The latest "meme" about the Iraq War is we're not fighting an insurgency, we're stuck in the middle of a civil war. The story changed because the Iraqi army and the U.S. forces are making real progress against the insurgency. The critics had to find a new angle. David Ignatius reports in Friday's Washington Post that the good guys are gaining the upper hand by fighting smarter and by using the "three P's" of the Iraq battlefield: "be polite," "be professional," and "be prepared to kill."

A brutal stress test came on Feb. 22, when Sunni insurgents destroyed a revered Shiite mosque in Samarra. For a moment, Iraq seemed to be slipping toward civil war, but the Iraqi army performed surprisingly well. In many areas Iraqi forces -- backed up by overwhelming U.S. firepower -- helped restore order. "You never know the tipping point until you're past it," says Gen. George Casey, the commander of American forces here. With many other U.S. and Iraqi officials, he hopes Samarra may have been such a tipping point, for the better.
So, the civil war that was supposed to erupt after the Samarra mosque bombing didn't happen because the "new" approach to the insurgency kept the violence in check. When did this "new" approach begin? About 18 - 24 months ago when the U.S. revamped its training program for the Iraqi army. Why haven't we heard about it before? We have. Every day for the last year and a half from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and the commanders on the ground in Iraq. We just didn't listen.

March 15, 2006

The Virtue of War

I recently finished reading The Virtue of War by Alexander F.C. Webster and Darrell Cole. While I got bogged down in the middle, I found the book quite interesting. Here is the review I posted on Amazon.com:

"This scholarly work provides ample evidence that a Just War is not the "lesser of two evils" but is rather a positive good. Using the Bible and reams and reams of references to the Church Fathers, Orthodox prelates, and Protestant reformers, the authors painstakingly back up their premise that war can be virtuous. The end of the book includes analyses of the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq. This worthwhile reading bogs down a bit in the middle where the authors continue to list their extensive references. The writing in this area speaks more of a scholarly effort than of popular fare, but once I was through this area, I was pleased to have made the effort. For those interested in learning about the historical, moral view of war, and seeing how recent developments in pacifistic thought have modified Just War Theory, I highly recommend this book."

I know it is now fashionable to think of war as a "lesser evil," but Fr. Webster and Professor Cole clearly show this is a modern tendency not shared throughout most of the Church's history.

March 13, 2006

Old Mass vs. New: What's the Difference?

For those who've been following our blog for the past few months, it comes as no surprise that our family has decided on attending the 1962 Indult (or "Tridentine") Mass at our new Parish, St. Margaret Mary in Oakland. Some of you might be wondering what the differences are between the Old Rite and the New Mass (the "Novus Ordo Missae" or "Novus Ordo," for short). Fr. Jim Tucker, a priest in the Diocese of Arlington, VA, has an excellent series comparing the Old Mass to the New at his blog, Dappled Things:

  • A summary of the difference between the forms of the Mass
  • A detailed description of the "Mass of the Catechumens" in the Old Rite ("Liturgy of the Word" in the New Rite)
  • A detailed description of the "Mass of the Faithful" in the Old Rite ("Liturgy of the Eucharist" in the New Rite)
  • A summary of the different forms of the Old Mass: Low ("Missa Lecta"), Sung High ("Missa Cantata"), and Solemn High ("Missa Solemnis").

This probably seems like inside baseball to anyone who isn't really interested in Catholic liturgy (i.e., most non-Catholics and many Catholics), but Lisa and I have both found it fascinating how much the details of the liturgy affect our day-to-day spiritual lives. The intention of the New Mass was to increase the "active participation" of the faithful. Sadly, this has often led to a misconception that "active" or "full" participation requires doing something all the time. There is no concept of active silence anymore. We've found that the Old Rite, particularly the High Masses, where the faithful chant the Ordinary of the Mass, offers ample opportunity for active participation.

Fr. Tucker's comments about the multi-layered nature of the Old Rite really hit on something: each of the faithful has his role, whether priest, server, choir, or the people. These roles are clearly defined, unique, and each is important. There's a real sense that we're joined in a common mission: commemorating the Lord's sacrifice on Calvary (the phrase "Ite Missa Est" from which the Mass gets its name refers to this sense of mission, and commands us to carry it forth into the rest of our lives). While I experience this sense sometimes during the New Mass, often it feels more like putting on a show (if you're involved in some sort of ministry) or being entertained (if you're not).

March 11, 2006

Speak to me only with Thine eyes...

Today Alex leaned toward my face to tell me that he loved me, after which he paused, then said, "Who is that person in your eyes?" I held still while he leaned forward to peer into my left eye. After a brief moment, he cried, "Alex!" He then checked the right eye and said, "Alex!" I asked him if he knew why he was in my eyes. He nodded his head yes and said, "Because I'm facing you." Just turned three and he already understands reflections!

March 9, 2006

Jesus "Decoded"

The US Conference of Catholic Bishops has a new website that serves as sort of a FAQ, answering a lot of the questions that have come up recently about Christianity, particularly as a result of The Da Vinci Code.

From what I've seen so far, it's a great site. Amy Welborn provides the "Truth Be Told" section, which takes on The Da Vinci Code directly.

Parental Notification makes a difference

The Washington Post has a story on a New England Journal of Medicine study confirming that the Texas law requiring parental notification before minors have abortions has had a noticeable effect. While abortion rates have been dropping overall, the rate for girls under 18 dropped more than for women over 18, and the rates declined the most for the youngest group of girls.

Supporters of Proposition 73, the California ballot measure on parental notification that narrowly failed during Governor Schwarzenegger's Special Election, are gathering signatures to get a parental notification measure on the ballot for the November 2006 General Election.

If you're registered to vote in California (Hi Betsy!), please take a minute to e-mail the organizers for a petition, fill it out, and mail it in (if you want to gather some more signatures first, that's even better!).

March 8, 2006

Celebrating Feast Days

During Lent, simplicity and severity adorn the Mass. Flowers are removed from the church, and processional and recessional music disappear. Music becomes simpler, and in the Tridentine Mass this means only chant with no polyphony. The trappings of the church remind us of the penitential aspects of this season. However, in the Tridentine Mass, this sparse manner gives way when a feast day takes precedence. On Tuesday, March 7, we celebrated the Feast of St. Thomas Aquinas, a favorite Saint of ours, and a patron of the Institute of Christ the King. Because of the nature of this Feast, our church was filled with flowers again, we heard organ music accompany the processions, and we even sang the Gloria, normally forbidden during Lent. After the sparseness of Lent, the joy of the flowers, music, and Gloria burst forth like a joyous shout. I'm not certain a Feast day has ever had quite that impact on me before.

In addition to attending Mass to celebrate the Angelic Doctor, we also received the opportunity to receive a plenary indulgence. Indulgences are probably one of the least understood sacramentals of the Church, and much maligned due to abuses back in the 1500's. Catholic Encyclopedia has a excellent article about indulgences that does a much better job explaining them than I could. Given this wonderful way to receive the graces of Jesus, how could anyone be anything but grateful?

March 5, 2006

Twirling, Twirling, Twirling Towards Freedom!

Gerald Augustinus, over at The Cafeteria is Closed alerted me to this video of a nightmarish Gospel procession at the hideously renovated St. Nicholas Church in Evanston, Illinois. Church Building Consultants, Inc. is the firm responsible for destroying the church's architecture (we can't blame them for the awful liturgy). If you poke around the their description of the St. Nicholas renovation, you notice that one of the side-effects of the architectural changes is that the church now seats far fewer people. I'm sure that comes in handy.

Perhaps "Father Dervish" is trying to symbolize St. Peter's body, spinning in its grave, at what's become of Our Lord's Church.

March 3, 2006

I Pledge Thee a Lock of My Hair

Our carpet often contains rather interesting flora and fauna, lovingly placed there (and then ground in) by our adorable children. So I'm never too surprised at what I find. I'm usually not too amused, either, and today didn't disappoint. While industriously preparing for Alex's 3rd birthday party, I raced around the house, periodically noticing something a little bit like a dead palm frond lying on the floor despite yesterday's vacuuming efforts. Finally I had enough time to go pick it up, and as I bent to retrieve the frond, I noticed it was a bit too hirsute for a plant. Yes, you probably guessed it before I did. It was a lock of Sarah's hair, about five inches long, and thankfully only a tiny amount.

I reconstructed the scene of the crime fairly easily. This morning I had given Sarah a cutting task while we learned about floor plans. She was to cut out some drawings of furniture that we would then place into a "room" on a piece of paper. Always trustworthy before this (okay, except a few years ago when she kept cutting up her pants!), I let her cut while I went to change Alex's diaper. When I returned, she busied herself with her task. What I didn't know then, of course, is that she's taken a break to see if she had "hairstylist" written in her future.

She admitted her crime, meekly received her punishment, and accepted the pronouncement that from now on cutting anything other than the paper I'd given her for that purpose would result in rather draconian punishment.

All in all, pretty good! I assumed she'd aim her first haircutting efforts at Alex, and I was prepared to greet a miniature Yule Brenner some day. Or, if she aimed the scissors at herself, I figured we'd require an emergency trip to the hairdressers. Instead I got a chance to head Sarah off at the pass with a mere 1/4 inch by 5 inch lock! I couldn't ask for a better break.

March 2, 2006

What if Microsoft marketed the iPod?

YouTube has a great video which speculates what it would be like if Microsoft marketed the iPod. Spot on!

(The original link for this video disappeared from YouTube pretty quickly. I hope this one lasts...)

March 1, 2006

"Memento, Homo, Quia Pulvis es...."

Today we receive ashes to mark the beginning of Lent. Most Catholics are familiar with the new method for distributing ashes: during the Mass, after the homily. "Don Jim" (Fr. Jim Tucker) has an English translation of the imposition of ashes according to the Old Rite over at Dappled Things.

What are you reading for Lent? If you're still looking for some ideas, check out The Lenten Bookshelf over at National Review Online.

Update: We received ashes at our church according to the Old Rite, and then attended the Traditional Latin Mass (or, more correctly, we "assisted at Mass"). The weekday Mass is a Low Mass, which to be honest, I don't like as much as the Solemn High Mass that is celebrated on Sundays. Still, it was clear (and perhaps, in a way, even more clear) during the Low Mass that we are not the focus of the Mass, Christ is.

Copyright © 2005-2011
Donald W. Roberts
Don Roberts Consulting
All rights reserved.